ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

风险调整 Cox 比例风险模型×对生存曲线进行比较的 Log-Rank 检验×
领域流行病学生存分析
方法族Process / pipelineSurvival analysis
起源年份1972 (Cox model); risk adjustment widespread from 1980s1966
提出者D. R. Cox (base model); risk-adjustment as routine practice formalised through clinical epidemiology literature from the 1980s onwardMantel, N.
类型Multivariable survival regressionNon-parametric hypothesis test
开创性文献Cox, D. R. (1972). Regression models and life-tables. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological), 34(2), 187–202. DOI ↗Mantel, N. (1966). Evaluation of Survival Data and Two New Rank Order Statistics Arising in Its Consideration. Cancer Chemotherapy Reports, 50(3), 163–170. link ↗
别名adjusted Cox regression, multivariable Cox model, covariate-adjusted survival analysis, risk-adjusted survival modelMantel log-rank test, Mantel-Cox test, log-rank sağkalım testi, Log-Rank Testi
相关52
摘要Risk-adjusted Cox proportional hazards regression extends the classical Cox (1972) survival model by simultaneously entering known confounders — age, sex, comorbidities, disease severity — into the model alongside the exposure of primary interest. This adjustment isolates the independent effect of the exposure on the hazard of an event, producing hazard ratios (HRs) that are not distorted by baseline differences between comparison groups. It is the most widely used method for multivariable survival analysis in clinical and epidemiological research.The log-rank test, developed by Nathan Mantel in 1966, is a non-parametric hypothesis test that compares the overall survival experience of two or more groups throughout the entire follow-up period. It is the standard companion to Kaplan-Meier curves and determines whether observed differences between curves are statistically meaningful.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Risk-adjusted Cox Proportional Hazards · Log-Rank Test. 于 2026-06-20 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare