ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

回顾性竞争风险分析×Kaplan-Meier分析×
领域流行病学流行病学
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份1978 (cause-specific); 1999 (subdistribution/Fine-Gray)1958
提出者Fine & Gray (subdistribution model); Prentice et al. (cause-specific framework)Edward L. Kaplan and Paul Meier
类型Retrospective observational survival analysisNonparametric survival estimator
开创性文献Fine, J. P., & Gray, R. J. (1999). A proportional hazards model for the subdistribution of a competing risk. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 94(446), 496–509. DOI ↗Kaplan, E. L., & Meier, P. (1958). Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 53(282), 457–481. DOI ↗
别名retrospective CRA, competing risks survival analysis (retrospective), cause-specific hazard analysis (retrospective), subdistribution hazard analysis (retrospective)KM analysis, KM estimator, product-limit estimator, Kaplan-Meier curve
相关45
摘要Retrospective competing risks analysis applies competing risks methodology to historical (already-collected) time-to-event data in which subjects can experience one of several mutually exclusive endpoints. It uses the cumulative incidence function and cause-specific or subdistribution hazard models to estimate the probability of each event type while accounting for the fact that occurrence of one event permanently precludes the others. Widely used in oncology, cardiology, and transplant medicine where administrative or registry records are the data source.Kaplan-Meier (KM) analysis is a nonparametric method for estimating the survival function from time-to-event data. Introduced by Kaplan and Meier in 1958, it produces the classic step-function survival curve that shows the probability of surviving beyond each observed event time, correctly accounting for censored observations — participants who left the study or had not yet experienced the event by the end of follow-up. It is one of the most widely used techniques in clinical and epidemiological research.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Retrospective competing risks analysis · Kaplan-Meier Analysis. 于 2026-06-17 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare