方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法；存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| 阅读动机问卷× | 学生投入度量表× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域 | 教育心理学 | 教育心理学 |
| 方法族 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 起源年份≠ | 2000 | 2004 |
| 提出者≠ | Allan Wigfield, John Guthrie | Jennifer Fredricks, Phyllis Blumenfeld, Alison Paris |
| 类型≠ | Reading motivation assessment | Multidimensional engagement assessment |
| 开创性文献≠ | Wigfield, A., & Guthrie, J. T. (2000). Engagement and motivation in reading. In M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, P. D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of Reading Research (Vol. 3, pp. 403-422). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. link ↗ | Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59-109. DOI ↗ |
| 别名 | MRQ, Reading Motivation Scale | SES, Academic Engagement Measure |
| 相关 | 4 | 4 |
| 摘要≠ | The Motivation for Reading Questionnaire (MRQ) is a self-report instrument assessing students' motivation to read and engagement with reading activities. Developed by Wigfield and Guthrie (2000), it measures both intrinsic motivation (reading for enjoyment and understanding) and extrinsic motivation (reading for grades or to avoid punishment), along with beliefs about reading efficacy and value. Reading motivation is a primary predictor of reading comprehension, frequency, and lifetime literacy engagement. | The Student Engagement Scale (SES) measures the extent to which students are actively involved in academic and social aspects of school or university life. Grounded in Fredricks et al.'s multidimensional framework, the instrument assesses behavioral engagement (participation, attendance, effort), emotional engagement (interest, belonging, enthusiasm), and cognitive engagement (mental effort, deep thinking, persistence). High engagement is consistently associated with better learning outcomes and well-being. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|