ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

阅读动机问卷×课程体验问卷×
领域教育心理学教育心理学
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份20001997
提出者Allan Wigfield, John GuthrieKim Wilson, Lucia Lizzio, Paul Ramsden
类型Reading motivation assessmentCourse experience assessment
开创性文献Wigfield, A., & Guthrie, J. T. (2000). Engagement and motivation in reading. In M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, P. D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of Reading Research (Vol. 3, pp. 403-422). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. link ↗Wilson, K. L., Lizzio, A., & Ramsden, P. (1997). The development, validation and application of the Course Experience Questionnaire. Studies in Higher Education, 22(1), 33-53. DOI ↗
别名MRQ, Reading Motivation ScaleCEQ, Learning Environment Questionnaire
相关44
摘要The Motivation for Reading Questionnaire (MRQ) is a self-report instrument assessing students' motivation to read and engagement with reading activities. Developed by Wigfield and Guthrie (2000), it measures both intrinsic motivation (reading for enjoyment and understanding) and extrinsic motivation (reading for grades or to avoid punishment), along with beliefs about reading efficacy and value. Reading motivation is a primary predictor of reading comprehension, frequency, and lifetime literacy engagement.The Course Experience Questionnaire (CEQ) is an institutional assessment tool measuring students' perceptions of their learning environment and educational experience in a course. Developed by Wilson, Lizzio, and Ramsden (1997), it assesses dimensions including good teaching, clear goals, appropriate workload, appropriate assessment, appropriate feedback, and learning community. The CEQ provides universities with evaluative data to guide curriculum development and educational improvement.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Motivation for Reading Questionnaire · Course Experience Questionnaire. 于 2026-06-18 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare