方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| 回归断点设计 (Regression Discontinuity Design, RDD)× | 因果推断的工具变量(IV)方法× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域≠ | 计量经济学 | 卫生经济学 |
| 方法族≠ | Regression model | Process / pipeline |
| 起源年份≠ | 2008 | 1990s (modern applications) |
| 提出者≠ | Imbens & Lemieux; Lee & Lemieux (modern practice); Cattaneo, Idrobo & Titiunik | Angrist & Pischke (applied econometrics); rooted in econometric theory |
| 类型≠ | Quasi-experimental causal design | Method |
| 开创性文献≠ | Imbens, G. W., & Lemieux, T. (2008). Regression Discontinuity Designs: A Guide to Practice. Journal of Econometrics, 142(2), 615-635. DOI ↗ | Angrist, J. D., & Pischke, J. S. (2009). Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist's Companion. Princeton: Princeton University Press. link ↗ |
| 别名 | RDD, regression discontinuity, sharp regression discontinuity, Regresyon Süreksizliği Tasarımı (RDD) | IV, two-stage least squares, TSLS, causal estimation |
| 相关≠ | 5 | 3 |
| 摘要≠ | Regression Discontinuity Design is a quasi-experimental method that estimates a local causal effect around a threshold (cutoff) value, comparing units just below and just above the cutoff as if they were almost randomly assigned. It is the design developed for applied practice by Imbens and Lemieux (2008) and by Lee and Lemieux (2010). | Instrumental variables (IV) is an econometric method to estimate causal effects when treatment or exposure is not randomly assigned and confounding is severe or unmeasured. IV relies on a third variable (instrument) that influences treatment but does not directly affect the outcome, allowing researchers to isolate the causal effect from the noise of confounding. Developed extensively in econometrics (Angrist & Pischke, 1990s–2000s), IV methods are increasingly used in health economics and health services research to leverage natural experiments and policy changes. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|