方法对比

	快速审查	范围界定审查
领域	科学计量学	科学计量学
方法族	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
起源年份	2000s (rapidly adopted after 2005; Cochrane guidance 2020–2021)	2005
提出者	Developed and formalised by health technology assessment agencies and the Cochrane Collaboration	Hilary Arksey & Lisa O'Malley
类型	Evidence synthesis review	Evidence synthesis review design
开创性文献	Garritty, C., Gartlehner, G., Nussbaumer-Streit, B., King, V. J., Hamel, C., Kamel, C., Affengruber, L., & Stevens, A. (2021). Cochrane Rapid Reviews Methods Group offers evidence-informed guidance to conduct rapid reviews. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 130, 13–22.	Arksey, H., & O'Malley, L. (2005). Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(1), 19–32.
别名	rapid evidence review, accelerated systematic review, rapid evidence assessment, REA	scoping study, literature scoping, evidence mapping review, rapid evidence map
相关	5	6
摘要	A rapid review is a streamlined form of systematic review that deliberately simplifies or omits certain steps — such as dual screening, exhaustive grey-literature search, or full risk-of-bias assessment — in order to deliver timely, policy-relevant evidence synthesis within weeks rather than years. It is increasingly used by health agencies, governments, and organisations facing urgent decision-making needs where a full systematic review is not feasible within the available time and resources.	A scoping review is a systematic evidence-synthesis method that maps the breadth and nature of research on a topic — identifying key concepts, evidence types, and gaps — without necessarily appraising study quality or pooling effect sizes. Developed by Arksey and O'Malley (2005) and refined by Levac and colleagues (2010), it is particularly valuable for emerging or heterogeneous fields where a full systematic review would be premature or infeasible.