ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

随机效用模型×委托×
领域博弈论博弈论
方法族Machine learningMachine learning
起源年份19741976
提出者Daniel McFaddenMichael Jensen, William Meckling, Bengt Holmstrom
类型algorithmalgorithm
开创性文献McFadden, D. (1974). Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. In P. Zarembka (Ed.), Frontiers in Econometrics (pp. 105-142). Academic Press. link ↗Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305-360. DOI ↗
别名Discrete Choice Model, Probabilistic Choice, Stochastic UtilityAgency Theory, Hidden Action Problem, Moral Hazard
相关44
摘要The Random Utility Model explains discrete choice behavior by assuming agents derive uncertain utilities from alternatives and choose the option yielding highest utility. Introduced by Daniel McFadden in 1974, the model decomposes utility into systematic (observable) and random (idiosyncratic) components, permitting probabilistic choice predictions. The logit model, a parametric specification, yields closed-form choice probabilities that are widely used in marketing, transportation, and environmental valuation.The Principal-Agent Model analyzes how a principal (e.g., owner, employer, policymaker) can incentivize an agent (e.g., manager, employee, firm) to act in the principal's interest when the agent has private information or can take hidden actions. Formalized by Jensen and Meckling in 1976, the model identifies agency costs arising from moral hazard (the agent exerts less effort than desired) and adverse selection (the agent hides unfavorable information). Optimal contracts balance incentives with risk allocation.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Random Utility Model · Principal-Agent Model. 于 2026-06-17 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare