方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| Qualitative Comparative Analysis× | 过程追踪× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域≠ | Political Science | 心理测量学 |
| 方法族≠ | Process / pipeline | Latent structure |
| 起源年份≠ | 1987 | 2005 |
| 提出者≠ | Charles C. Ragin | Alexander George, Andrew Bennett |
| 类型≠ | Set-theoretic, configurational comparative method | Qualitative causal inference |
| 开创性文献≠ | Ragin, C. C. (1987). The Comparative Method: Moving Beyond Qualitative and Quantitative Strategies. Berkeley: University of California Press. ISBN: 9780520058347 | Bennett, A., & Checkel, J. T. (Eds.). (2015). Process Tracing: From Metaphor to Analytic Tool. Cambridge University Press. DOI ↗ |
| 别名≠ | QCA, csQCA, fsQCA, Configurational comparative method | — |
| 相关≠ | 3 | 5 |
| 摘要≠ | Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) is a set-theoretic, configurational method that identifies which combinations of conditions are necessary or sufficient for an outcome across a set of cases. Developed by Charles Ragin, it treats each case as a configuration of set memberships, builds a truth table of all logically possible combinations, and uses Boolean algebra to minimize them into the simplest expressions that account for the outcome. It bridges qualitative case knowledge and cross-case generalization, embracing causal complexity through conjunctural causation, equifinality, and asymmetry. | Process Tracing is a qualitative research method developed by George and Bennett (2005) for studying causal mechanisms and causal chains within individual cases. It involves examining the sequence of events and decision-making processes within a case to infer whether a hypothesized causal mechanism actually operated. Process tracing aims to strengthen causal inference in case studies by looking beyond correlation to understand how causes produce effects. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|