ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

Qualitative Comparative Analysis×过程追踪×
领域Political Science心理测量学
方法族Process / pipelineLatent structure
起源年份19872005
提出者Charles C. RaginAlexander George, Andrew Bennett
类型Set-theoretic, configurational comparative methodQualitative causal inference
开创性文献Ragin, C. C. (1987). The Comparative Method: Moving Beyond Qualitative and Quantitative Strategies. Berkeley: University of California Press. ISBN: 9780520058347Bennett, A., & Checkel, J. T. (Eds.). (2015). Process Tracing: From Metaphor to Analytic Tool. Cambridge University Press. DOI ↗
别名QCA, csQCA, fsQCA, Configurational comparative method
相关35
摘要Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) is a set-theoretic, configurational method that identifies which combinations of conditions are necessary or sufficient for an outcome across a set of cases. Developed by Charles Ragin, it treats each case as a configuration of set memberships, builds a truth table of all logically possible combinations, and uses Boolean algebra to minimize them into the simplest expressions that account for the outcome. It bridges qualitative case knowledge and cross-case generalization, embracing causal complexity through conjunctural causation, equifinality, and asymmetry.Process Tracing is a qualitative research method developed by George and Bennett (2005) for studying causal mechanisms and causal chains within individual cases. It involves examining the sequence of events and decision-making processes within a case to infer whether a hypothesized causal mechanism actually operated. Process tracing aims to strengthen causal inference in case studies by looking beyond correlation to understand how causes produce effects.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 3 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Qualitative Comparative Analysis · Process Tracing. 于 2026-06-24 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare