ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

前瞻性随机临床试验×实用性随机临床试验×
领域流行病学流行病学
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份1948 (landmark MRC streptomycin trial)1967
提出者Austin Bradford Hill / Medical Research CouncilDaniel Schwartz & Joseph Lellouch
类型Experimental / interventional study designInterventional study design
开创性文献Medical Research Council (1948). Streptomycin treatment of pulmonary tuberculosis: a Medical Research Council investigation. British Medical Journal, 2(4582), 769–782. link ↗Schwartz, D., & Lellouch, J. (1967). Explanatory and pragmatic attitudes in therapeutical trials. Journal of Chronic Diseases, 20(8), 637–648. DOI ↗
别名Prospective RCT, randomized controlled trial, RCT, controlled clinical trialpragmatic RCT, effectiveness trial, real-world RCT, practical clinical trial
相关56
摘要A prospective randomized clinical trial (RCT) is an experimental study in which participants are assigned to intervention or control groups by chance before any outcomes are observed, then followed forward in time. Random allocation eliminates systematic selection bias, making this design the gold standard for establishing causal efficacy of treatments in medicine and clinical research.A pragmatic randomized clinical trial (pragmatic RCT) is an interventional study that tests whether a treatment works under routine clinical conditions, as opposed to the tightly controlled setting of an explanatory trial. It prioritizes broad eligibility, flexible delivery, and patient-relevant outcomes to answer the question 'Does this treatment work in everyday practice?' rather than 'Can this treatment work under ideal circumstances?' The distinction between pragmatic and explanatory trials was formally articulated by Schwartz and Lellouch in 1967 and operationalized by the PRECIS tool in 2009.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial · Pragmatic randomized clinical trial. 于 2026-06-19 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare