ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

前瞻性诊断准确性研究×筛查试验评估×
领域流行病学流行病学
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份Formalized 2000s; practice dates to mid-20th century1968 (Wilson-Jungner principles); statistical framework developed 1970s–2000s
提出者Established through STARD initiative (Bossuyt, Reitsma et al., 2000s)Wilson & Jungner (WHO criteria, 1968); foundational work by Pepe, Altman, and others in statistical test evaluation
类型Observational / evaluative study designObservational diagnostic / epidemiological evaluation design
开创性文献Bossuyt, P. M., Reitsma, J. B., Bruns, D. E., Gatsonis, C. A., Glasziou, P. P., Irwig, L., ... & Cohen, J. F. (2015). STARD 2015: an updated list of essential items for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies. BMJ, 351, h5527. DOI ↗Wilson, J. M. G., & Jungner, G. (1968). Principles and Practice of Screening for Disease. World Health Organization. Public Health Papers No. 34. link ↗
别名prospective DTA study, prospective test accuracy study, forward-looking diagnostic study, prospective index test evaluationscreening study, screening performance evaluation, screening accuracy assessment, STE
相关66
摘要A prospective diagnostic accuracy study enrolls participants before any test results are known and follows them forward in time to evaluate how well an index test (the test under evaluation) distinguishes individuals with and without a target condition, using a reference standard applied independently. Key accuracy metrics include sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and the area under the ROC curve. The prospective design reduces many biases inherent in retrospective test evaluations.Screening test evaluation is a systematic epidemiological approach for assessing whether a test or program can accurately and cost-effectively identify individuals with a condition before symptoms appear. It quantifies diagnostic performance metrics — sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, and the ROC curve — and evaluates whether a screening program meets established public health criteria for adoption and harm-benefit balance.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Prospective Diagnostic Accuracy Study · Screening Test Evaluation. 于 2026-06-17 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare