ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

教育研究中的倾向得分加权×逆概率治疗加权法 (IPW / IPTW)×
领域因果推断因果推断
方法族Regression modelRegression model
起源年份1983 (theory); widely adopted in education research from 2000s2000
提出者Rosenbaum & Rubin (foundational theory, 1983); Thoemmes & Kim (education-focused review, 2011)Robins, Hernán & Brumback
类型Quasi-experimental causal inferenceCausal inference weighting estimator
开创性文献Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41-55. DOI ↗Robins, J. M., Hernán, M. A., & Brumback, B. (2000). Marginal Structural Models and Causal Inference in Epidemiology. Epidemiology, 11(5), 550-560. DOI ↗
别名PSW in education, inverse probability weighting in education, IPW education, propensity weighting educationIPW, IPTW, inverse probability of treatment weighting, marginal structural model weighting
相关55
摘要Propensity score weighting (PSW) is a quasi-experimental technique that reweights observational samples so that treated and comparison students look similar on measured background characteristics, allowing credible causal estimates of educational interventions — such as program participation, instructional method, or school type — without random assignment.Inverse Probability Weighting is a causal-inference method that assigns each observation a weight equal to the inverse of its probability of receiving the treatment it actually received. Introduced by Robins, Hernán and Brumback (2000) for marginal structural models, it builds a pseudo-population in which treatment is independent of measured confounders, balancing selection bias.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Propensity Score Weighting in Education Research · Inverse Probability Weighting. 于 2026-06-20 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare