ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

教育研究中的倾向得分加权×双重差分法 (Diff-in-Diff)×
领域因果推断计量经济学
方法族Regression modelRegression model
起源年份1983 (theory); widely adopted in education research from 2000s1994
提出者Rosenbaum & Rubin (foundational theory, 1983); Thoemmes & Kim (education-focused review, 2011)Card & Krueger (canonical 1994 application); Angrist & Pischke (textbook treatment)
类型Quasi-experimental causal inferenceCausal inference / panel regression
开创性文献Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41-55. DOI ↗Angrist, J. D., & Pischke, J.-S. (2009). Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist's Companion. Princeton University Press. ISBN: 978-0691120355
别名PSW in education, inverse probability weighting in education, IPW education, propensity weighting educationdiff-in-diff, DiD, Farkların Farkı (Diff-in-Diff)
相关55
摘要Propensity score weighting (PSW) is a quasi-experimental technique that reweights observational samples so that treated and comparison students look similar on measured background characteristics, allowing credible causal estimates of educational interventions — such as program participation, instructional method, or school type — without random assignment.Difference-in-Differences is a causal-inference method that estimates the effect of an intervention by comparing how a treatment group and a control group change over time. Made famous by Card and Krueger's 1994 minimum-wage study and developed in Angrist and Pischke's Mostly Harmless Econometrics, it isolates the treatment effect as the difference between the two groups' before-after changes.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Propensity Score Weighting in Education Research · Difference-in-Differences. 于 2026-06-19 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare