ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

教育研究中的倾向得分匹配×逆概率治疗加权法 (IPW / IPTW)×
领域因果推断因果推断
方法族Regression modelRegression model
起源年份1983 (foundational); education adoption widespread from late 1990s2000
提出者Rosenbaum & Rubin (1983); widely adopted in education research via Shadish, Cook & Campbell (2002)Robins, Hernán & Brumback
类型Quasi-experimental / matching-based causal inferenceCausal inference weighting estimator
开创性文献Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41-55. DOI ↗Robins, J. M., Hernán, M. A., & Brumback, B. (2000). Marginal Structural Models and Causal Inference in Epidemiology. Epidemiology, 11(5), 550-560. DOI ↗
别名PSM in education, educational PSM, PSM for program evaluation in schools, propensity matching educationIPW, IPTW, inverse probability of treatment weighting, marginal structural model weighting
相关55
摘要Propensity Score Matching (PSM) in education research is a quasi-experimental technique that creates comparable treatment and control groups from observational student, teacher, or school data. By balancing groups on observed background characteristics, it enables credible causal estimates of educational interventions — such as tutoring programs, school choice policies, or teacher professional development — when random assignment is infeasible.Inverse Probability Weighting is a causal-inference method that assigns each observation a weight equal to the inverse of its probability of receiving the treatment it actually received. Introduced by Robins, Hernán and Brumback (2000) for marginal structural models, it builds a pseudo-population in which treatment is independent of measured confounders, balancing selection bias.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Propensity Score Matching in Education Research · Inverse Probability Weighting. 于 2026-06-20 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare