ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

教育研究中的倾向得分匹配×粗化精确匹配 (CEM)×
领域因果推断因果推断
方法族Regression modelRegression model
起源年份1983 (foundational); education adoption widespread from late 1990s2011-2012
提出者Rosenbaum & Rubin (1983); widely adopted in education research via Shadish, Cook & Campbell (2002)Iacus, King, & Porro
类型Quasi-experimental / matching-based causal inferenceMatching / causal inference
开创性文献Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41-55. DOI ↗Iacus, S. M., King, G., & Porro, G. (2012). Causal Inference without Balance Checking: Coarsened Exact Matching. Political Analysis, 20(1), 1-24. DOI ↗
别名PSM in education, educational PSM, PSM for program evaluation in schools, propensity matching educationCEM, coarsened matching, monotonic imbalance bounding matching
相关56
摘要Propensity Score Matching (PSM) in education research is a quasi-experimental technique that creates comparable treatment and control groups from observational student, teacher, or school data. By balancing groups on observed background characteristics, it enables credible causal estimates of educational interventions — such as tutoring programs, school choice policies, or teacher professional development — when random assignment is infeasible.Coarsened Exact Matching is a preprocessing method that achieves covariate balance by temporarily coarsening continuous variables into bins, exactly matching treated and control units within those bins, and then discarding all unmatched units. Introduced by Iacus, King, and Porro (2011, 2012), it bounds imbalance on each covariate independently, yielding a matched sample on which any estimator can be applied without relying on a propensity score model.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Propensity Score Matching in Education Research · Coarsened Exact Matching. 于 2026-06-20 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare