方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| 结构方程模型(SEM)的功效分析× | 基于仿真的功效分析(蒙特卡洛功效)× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域 | 统计学 | 统计学 |
| 方法族 | Hypothesis test | Hypothesis test |
| 起源年份≠ | 1996 | 2011 |
| 提出者≠ | MacCallum, Browne & Sugawara | Arnold et al. (2011); Green & MacLeod (2016) for mixed-model extension |
| 类型≠ | Sample size planning (multivariate / SEM) | Simulation-based (Monte Carlo) |
| 开创性文献≠ | MacCallum, R. C., Browne, M. W., & Sugawara, H. M. (1996). Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychological Methods, 1(2), 130–149. DOI ↗ | Arnold, B.F. et al. (2011). Simulation Methods to Estimate Design Power: An Overview for Applied Research. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 11, 94. DOI ↗ |
| 别名 | SEM sample size planning, covariance structure power analysis, MANOVA power analysis, SEM / Çok Değişkenli Güç Analizi | Monte Carlo power analysis, Monte Carlo simulation power, MC power, Simülasyon Tabanlı Güç Analizi (Monte Carlo Power) |
| 相关 | 6 | 6 |
| 摘要≠ | Power analysis for SEM and other multivariate procedures determines the minimum sample size required to detect a model misfit of a specified magnitude with adequate probability. The dominant approach, introduced by MacCallum, Browne, and Sugawara in 1996, expresses effect size as the Root Mean Square Error of Approximation (RMSEA) and derives power from the noncentral chi-square distribution. | Simulation-based power analysis estimates the statistical power and required sample size of a study by repeating a full analysis pipeline thousands of times on artificially generated data. Because it relies on Monte Carlo simulation rather than closed-form equations, it is applicable to designs — mixed models, complex measurement structures, non-standard outcomes — where analytical power formulas do not exist. The approach was systematically described for applied research by Arnold et al. in 2011, and the mixed-model implementation via the SIMR package was formalised by Green and MacLeod in 2016. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|