方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法；存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| 结构方程模型（SEM）的功效分析× | 多层和混合效应模型的功效分析× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域 | 统计学 | 统计学 |
| 方法族 | Hypothesis test | Hypothesis test |
| 起源年份≠ | 1996 | 1993 |
| 提出者≠ | MacCallum, Browne & Sugawara | Snijders & Bosker; Hox, Moerbeek & van de Schoot |
| 类型≠ | Sample size planning (multivariate / SEM) | Sample-size planning for hierarchical designs |
| 开创性文献≠ | MacCallum, R. C., Browne, M. W., & Sugawara, H. M. (1996). Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychological Methods, 1(2), 130–149. DOI ↗ | Snijders, T.A.B. & Bosker, R.J. (2012). Multilevel Analysis: An Introduction to Basic and Advanced Multilevel Modeling (2nd ed.). SAGE. ISBN: 978-1849202015 |
| 别名 | SEM sample size planning, covariance structure power analysis, MANOVA power analysis, SEM / Çok Değişkenli Güç Analizi | HLM power analysis, mixed-effects power analysis, clustered design power analysis, Çok Düzeyli / Karma Model Güç Analizi |
| 相关≠ | 6 | 4 |
| 摘要≠ | Power analysis for SEM and other multivariate procedures determines the minimum sample size required to detect a model misfit of a specified magnitude with adequate probability. The dominant approach, introduced by MacCallum, Browne, and Sugawara in 1996, expresses effect size as the Root Mean Square Error of Approximation (RMSEA) and derives power from the noncentral chi-square distribution. | Multilevel power analysis is a sample-size planning procedure designed for hierarchical, clustered, or longitudinal study designs in which observations are nested within higher-level units such as students within schools or patients within clinics. Formalized in the multilevel modeling literature by Snijders and Bosker (1993, expanded 2012) and Hox, Moerbeek, and van de Schoot (2017), it accounts for the intraclass correlation (ICC) and the design effect that arises when data are clustered, ensuring that both the number of clusters and the cluster size are adequate to detect a target effect. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|