ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

政策评估倾向得分加权×逆概率治疗加权法 (IPW / IPTW)×
领域因果推断因果推断
方法族Regression modelRegression model
起源年份1983/20032000
提出者Rosenbaum & Rubin (1983); extended to policy evaluation by Hirano, Imbens & Ridder (2003)Robins, Hernán & Brumback
类型Quasi-experimental causal inferenceCausal inference weighting estimator
开创性文献Hirano, K., Imbens, G. W., & Ridder, G. (2003). Efficient Estimation of Average Treatment Effects Using the Estimated Propensity Score. Econometrica, 71(4), 1161-1189. DOI ↗Robins, J. M., Hernán, M. A., & Brumback, B. (2000). Marginal Structural Models and Causal Inference in Epidemiology. Epidemiology, 11(5), 550-560. DOI ↗
别名PSW policy evaluation, inverse probability weighting for policy, IPW policy evaluation, policy PSWIPW, IPTW, inverse probability of treatment weighting, marginal structural model weighting
相关65
摘要Policy evaluation propensity score weighting applies inverse-probability weighting to observational data to estimate the causal effect of a policy program. By reweighting participants and non-participants so they resemble a target population, it removes selection bias from voluntary or administratively allocated program assignment without requiring randomization.Inverse Probability Weighting is a causal-inference method that assigns each observation a weight equal to the inverse of its probability of receiving the treatment it actually received. Introduced by Robins, Hernán and Brumback (2000) for marginal structural models, it builds a pseudo-population in which treatment is independent of measured confounders, balancing selection bias.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Policy Evaluation Propensity Score Weighting · Inverse Probability Weighting. 于 2026-06-19 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare