ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

政策评估倾向得分匹配×逆概率治疗加权法 (IPW / IPTW)×
领域因果推断因果推断
方法族Regression modelRegression model
起源年份1983; policy evaluation adaptation 19972000
提出者Rosenbaum & Rubin (1983); Heckman, Ichimura & Todd (1997) for program/policy evaluation applicationRobins, Hernán & Brumback
类型Quasi-experimental matching estimatorCausal inference weighting estimator
开创性文献Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41-55. DOI ↗Robins, J. M., Hernán, M. A., & Brumback, B. (2000). Marginal Structural Models and Causal Inference in Epidemiology. Epidemiology, 11(5), 550-560. DOI ↗
别名PSM policy evaluation, policy PSM, propensity matching for program evaluation, PSM treatment evaluationIPW, IPTW, inverse probability of treatment weighting, marginal structural model weighting
相关65
摘要Policy evaluation propensity score matching applies the propensity score framework — originally developed by Rosenbaum and Rubin (1983) and operationalized for program evaluation by Heckman et al. (1997) — to estimate the causal effect of a policy intervention. It constructs a credible comparison group from non-participants by matching them to participants on their estimated probability of receiving the treatment, enabling unbiased effect estimation without random assignment.Inverse Probability Weighting is a causal-inference method that assigns each observation a weight equal to the inverse of its probability of receiving the treatment it actually received. Introduced by Robins, Hernán and Brumback (2000) for marginal structural models, it builds a pseudo-population in which treatment is independent of measured confounders, balancing selection bias.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Policy Evaluation Propensity Score Matching · Inverse Probability Weighting. 于 2026-06-19 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare