方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| 政策评估倾向得分匹配× | 粗化精确匹配 (CEM)× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域 | 因果推断 | 因果推断 |
| 方法族 | Regression model | Regression model |
| 起源年份≠ | 1983; policy evaluation adaptation 1997 | 2011-2012 |
| 提出者≠ | Rosenbaum & Rubin (1983); Heckman, Ichimura & Todd (1997) for program/policy evaluation application | Iacus, King, & Porro |
| 类型≠ | Quasi-experimental matching estimator | Matching / causal inference |
| 开创性文献≠ | Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41-55. DOI ↗ | Iacus, S. M., King, G., & Porro, G. (2012). Causal Inference without Balance Checking: Coarsened Exact Matching. Political Analysis, 20(1), 1-24. DOI ↗ |
| 别名≠ | PSM policy evaluation, policy PSM, propensity matching for program evaluation, PSM treatment evaluation | CEM, coarsened matching, monotonic imbalance bounding matching |
| 相关 | 6 | 6 |
| 摘要≠ | Policy evaluation propensity score matching applies the propensity score framework — originally developed by Rosenbaum and Rubin (1983) and operationalized for program evaluation by Heckman et al. (1997) — to estimate the causal effect of a policy intervention. It constructs a credible comparison group from non-participants by matching them to participants on their estimated probability of receiving the treatment, enabling unbiased effect estimation without random assignment. | Coarsened Exact Matching is a preprocessing method that achieves covariate balance by temporarily coarsening continuous variables into bins, exactly matching treated and control units within those bins, and then discarding all unmatched units. Introduced by Iacus, King, and Porro (2011, 2012), it bounds imbalance on each covariate independently, yielding a matched sample on which any estimator can be applied without relying on a propensity score model. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|