ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

政策评估边际结构模型×反事实影响评估 (CIE)×
领域因果推断因果推断
方法族Regression modelRegression model
起源年份20001970s–2000s
提出者James M. Robins, Miguel A. Hernan, Babette BrumbackHeckman, Imbens, Rubin, and the program evaluation literature
类型Causal inference / weighted regressionCausal inference / program evaluation
开创性文献Robins, J. M., Hernan, M. A., & Brumback, B. (2000). Marginal structural models and causal inference in epidemiology. Epidemiology, 11(5), 550–560. DOI ↗Heckman, J. J., & Vytlacil, E. J. (2007). Econometric evaluation of social programs, Part I: Causal models, structural models and econometric policy evaluation. Handbook of Econometrics, 6B, 4779-4874. DOI ↗
别名MSM for policy evaluation, policy MSM, causal MSM, structural policy weighting modelCIE, counterfactual evaluation, counterfactual policy evaluation, impact evaluation
相关65
摘要A Policy Evaluation Marginal Structural Model (MSM) is a causal inference framework that estimates the population-average effect of a policy by using inverse probability weighting to create a pseudo-population in which treatment assignment is independent of measured confounders, enabling unbiased comparison of potential outcomes under different policy scenarios from observational data.Counterfactual Impact Evaluation is a family of causal methods that estimates the effect of an intervention by comparing what actually happened to participants with what would have happened had the intervention not taken place. Formalised in the Rubin Causal Model and extended by Heckman, Imbens and others, CIE underlies most modern program and policy evaluation practice.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Policy Evaluation Marginal Structural Model · Counterfactual Impact Evaluation. 于 2026-06-19 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare