方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法；存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| 学术研究中的剽窃× | ICMJE 作者署名标准× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域 | 出版伦理 | 出版伦理 |
| 方法族 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 起源年份≠ | 1989 | 1978 |
| 提出者≠ | U.S. Office of Research Integrity (ORI) and institutional policies | International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) |
| 类型 | Standard | Standard |
| 开创性文献≠ | U.S. Office of Research Integrity (2023). Definition of Research Misconduct. Federal Policy on Research Misconduct (42 CFR Part 93). ORI. link ↗ | International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (2023). Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals. ICMJE. link ↗ |
| 别名≠ | Text Plagiarism, Idea Plagiarism, Self-Plagiarism | ICMJE Authorship, Authorship Guidelines |
| 相关 | 4 | 4 |
| 摘要≠ | Plagiarism—the use of others' words, ideas, or methods without attribution—is formally classified as research misconduct by the U.S. Office of Research Integrity and most institutions worldwide. It ranges from verbatim copying of text to paraphrasing without citation to presenting others' ideas as one's own. Unlike accidental omission of a citation (which is corrected via erratum), plagiarism implies intent or gross negligence and triggers investigation, potential retraction, and career consequences. Plagiarism detection tools (e.g., Turnitin, iThenticate) and manual checking by journals now routinely screen manuscripts. | The International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) established the most widely adopted authorship standard in biomedical research in 1978. These criteria define who qualifies as an author and distinguish authors from contributors, establishing accountability and preventing disputes over publication credit. Used by over 10,000 journals globally, ICMJE authorship criteria form the foundation of authorship practices in medical, life science, and health-related research. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|