方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法；存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| 学术研究中的剽窃× | 重复发表与“香肠切片”式发表× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域 | 出版伦理 | 出版伦理 |
| 方法族 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 起源年份≠ | 1989 | 1997 |
| 提出者≠ | U.S. Office of Research Integrity (ORI) and institutional policies | Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) |
| 类型 | Standard | Standard |
| 开创性文献≠ | U.S. Office of Research Integrity (2023). Definition of Research Misconduct. Federal Policy on Research Misconduct (42 CFR Part 93). ORI. link ↗ | Committee on Publication Ethics (2023). COPE Guidelines. Flowcharts and Advice on Publication Ethics. COPE. link ↗ |
| 别名 | Text Plagiarism, Idea Plagiarism, Self-Plagiarism | Redundant Publication, Overlapping Publication, Fragmented Research |
| 相关 | 4 | 4 |
| 摘要≠ | Plagiarism—the use of others' words, ideas, or methods without attribution—is formally classified as research misconduct by the U.S. Office of Research Integrity and most institutions worldwide. It ranges from verbatim copying of text to paraphrasing without citation to presenting others' ideas as one's own. Unlike accidental omission of a citation (which is corrected via erratum), plagiarism implies intent or gross negligence and triggers investigation, potential retraction, and career consequences. Plagiarism detection tools (e.g., Turnitin, iThenticate) and manual checking by journals now routinely screen manuscripts. | Duplicate publication occurs when the same research data are published more than once without acknowledgment or justification, presenting the same or substantially similar results as previously published work. Salami slicing is the related practice of dividing the results of a single study into the smallest possible publishable units and submitting them as separate papers to multiply publication counts. Both practices artificially inflate research output, mislead readers, and violate ethical standards upheld by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and research integrity organizations worldwide. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|