ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

PIvot Pairwise RElative Criteria Importance Assessment×加法比率评估×
领域决策决策
方法族MCDMMCDM
起源年份20172010
提出者Stanujkić, D., Karabašević, D., Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z., Maksimović, M.Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z.
类型Pivot pairwise sequential ratio weightingAdditive utility ratio (optimal reference row)
开创性文献Stanujkić, D., Karabašević, D., Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z., Maksimović, M. (2017). An approach to determining customer satisfaction in mobile commerce: A new approach to the SWARA method — PIPRECIA. Transformations in Business & Economics link ↗Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. (2010). A new additive ratio assessment (ARAS) method in multicriteria decision-making. Technological and Economic Development of Economy link ↗
别名
相关88
摘要PIPRECIA (PIvot Pairwise RElative Criteria Importance Assessment) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Stanujkić, D., Karabašević, D., Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z., Maksimović, M. in 2017. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.ARAS (Additive Ratio Assessment) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. in 2010. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 1 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: PIPRECIA · ARAS. 于 2026-06-18 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare