ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

第四期研究×队列研究×
领域流行病学流行病学
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份Formalised 1970s–1990s (ICH E3 guideline 1994)Mid-20th century (formal epidemiological design codified ~1950s)
提出者Regulatory agencies and pharmaceutical industry (ICH, FDA, EMA frameworks)Doll & Hill (British Doctors Study, 1951); Snow (cholera, 1854)
类型Post-marketing observational or interventional studyObservational longitudinal study design
开创性文献International Conference on Harmonisation (ICH). (1994). ICH Harmonised Tripartite Guideline: Structure and Content of Clinical Study Reports E3. ICH Secretariat. link ↗Rothman, K. J., Greenland, S., & Lash, T. L. (2008). Modern Epidemiology (3rd ed.). Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. ISBN: 978-0781755641
别名post-marketing surveillance study, post-approval study, Phase 4 study, PMS studylongitudinal study, follow-up study, panel study, incidence study
相关56
摘要A Phase IV study is a post-marketing surveillance study conducted after a drug, device, or intervention has received regulatory approval. Its primary purpose is to monitor long-term safety, detect rare adverse events, assess effectiveness in routine clinical practice, and explore new indications or populations not adequately represented in earlier trials. Phase IV evidence accumulates continuously throughout a product's commercial life.A cohort study assembles a group of individuals who share a common starting point — typically freedom from the outcome of interest — and follows them over time to observe who develops the outcome. By comparing incidence rates between exposed and unexposed subgroups, researchers can estimate relative risk and absolute risk differences. Cohort studies are the gold-standard observational design for measuring disease incidence and establishing temporal relationships between exposure and outcome.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Phase IV study · Cohort Study. 于 2026-06-17 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare