ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

岩石薄片分析×岩体分类×
领域地球科学地球科学
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份18581974
提出者Henry Clifton SorbyBieniawski and Barton
类型compositional characterization pipelineengineering geology assessment pipeline
开创性文献Tucker, M. E. (2003). Sedimentary Rocks in the Field: A Color Guide (3rd ed.). John Wiley & Sons. link ↗Bieniawski, Z. T. (1989). Engineering Rock Mass Classifications. John Wiley & Sons. link ↗
别名microscopy analysis, thin section analysis, modal composition determinationRMR system, Q-system classification, rock quality designation
相关54
摘要Petrographic analysis is the microscopic examination of rock thin sections to determine mineral composition, grain size, texture, and diagenetic alteration. Pioneered by Sorby in 1858, this method remains the gold standard for understanding lithology and has evolved to include quantitative image analysis and cathodoluminescence. Petrographic data anchor well-log interpretation, validate seismic velocity models, and constrain paleoenvironmental and diagenetic histories.Rock mass classification is the systematic assessment of rock quality and mechanical behavior in engineering geology, combining field observations of jointing, weathering, and strength into a numerical index. Pioneered by Bieniawski (RMR system, 1974) and Barton (Q-system, 1974), these methods enable rapid site assessment and guide design of excavations, dams, and slopes. Classification bridges the gap between small laboratory samples and large field-scale behavior.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 3 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Petrographic Analysis · Rock Mass Classification. 于 2026-06-18 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare