ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

组织协助系统感知就绪度 (PORAS)×循证实践态度量表 (EBPAS-36)×
领域实施科学实施科学
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份20092005
提出者Christopher D. Helfrich, PhD; Ying-Fang Li, PhD; Neil D. Sharp, MD; colleagues at Veterans Affairs and University of WashingtonGregory A. Aarons, PhD
类型Self-report organizational surveySelf-report questionnaire
开创性文献Helfrich, C. D., Li, Y. F., Sharp, N. D., & Sales, A. E. (2009). Organizational readiness to change assessment (ORCA): Development of an instrument based on the perspectives of health care professionals. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 16(4), 523–530. link ↗Aarons, G. A. (2011). Evidence-Based Practice Attitude Scale-50 (EBPAS-50) and EBPAS-36 short form: Psychometric properties. Implementation Science, 6(1), 89. link ↗
别名PORAS, Perceived Organizational Readiness, Perceived Readiness ScaleEBPAS, EBPAS-36, Evidence-Based Practice Attitude
相关55
摘要The Perceived Organizational Readiness for Assisting the System (PORAS) is a 19-item self-report measure developed by Helfrich and colleagues to assess organizational readiness to implement health information technology systems and other healthcare innovations. Grounded in Weiner's theory of organizational readiness for change, the PORAS measures four dimensions of readiness: Valence (perceived importance of the change to the organization), Motivation (organizational commitment and drive to implement), Resource Adequacy (availability of financial, human, and technical resources), and Change Efficacy (staff belief in organizational capability to successfully implement). While originally developed for health IT implementation, the PORAS framework and scale are applicable to broader healthcare innovations and evidence-based practice implementation.The EBPAS-36 is a 36-item self-report questionnaire that assesses clinicians' and organizational leaders' attitudes toward adopting and implementing evidence-based practices (EBP). Developed by Aarons in 2005 and refined through multiple validation studies, it measures four core dimensions: perceived requirements to adopt EBP, the appeal and usefulness of EBP to individual practice, organizational openness to innovation, and perceived divergence between current practice and EBP requirements. The EBPAS is widely used in healthcare, mental health, child welfare, and substance abuse treatment settings to predict adoption readiness and guide implementation planning.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: PORAS · EBPAS-36. 于 2026-06-19 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare