方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| 参与式制度民族志× | 批判性民族志× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域 | 质性 | 质性 |
| 方法族 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 起源年份≠ | 1990s–2000s | Late 20th century (~1980s–1993 systematisation) |
| 提出者≠ | Dorothy E. Smith (IE); participatory variant developed by Janet Rankin, Marie Campbell, and others in health and social sciences | Jim Thomas (systematised); rooted in Frankfurt School critical theory (Adorno, Horkheimer) and feminist/postcolonial traditions |
| 类型≠ | Qualitative research design | Qualitative research method |
| 开创性文献≠ | Smith, D. E. (2005). Institutional Ethnography: A Sociology for People. AltaMira Press. ISBN: 978-0759105010 | Thomas, J. (1993). Doing Critical Ethnography. Sage Publications. link ↗ |
| 别名≠ | participatory IE, community-based institutional ethnography, collaborative institutional ethnography | critical ethnographic research, critical qualitative ethnography, advocacy ethnography, emancipatory ethnography |
| 相关 | 6 | 6 |
| 摘要≠ | Participatory Institutional Ethnography (PIE) combines Dorothy Smith's institutional ethnography with participatory research principles, positioning community members or service users as co-researchers who investigate how institutional relations, ruling texts, and organizational practices shape and often constrain their everyday lives. The approach aims both to produce knowledge about institutional coordination and to generate actionable change through collaborative inquiry. | Critical ethnography is a qualitative research approach that combines sustained fieldwork immersion with explicit critical theory to examine how power, inequality, and ideology shape the lived experiences of marginalised communities. Unlike conventional ethnography, which aims to describe a culture as it is, critical ethnography commits the researcher to questioning what is taken for granted and to producing knowledge that can serve as a resource for social change. Rooted in Frankfurt School critical theory and expanded through feminist, postcolonial, and race-critical traditions, it treats the research process itself as a political act. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|