ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

参与式解释现象学×叙事探究×
领域质性质性研究
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份1990s–2000s2000
提出者Martin Heidegger (hermeneutic base); Max van Manen (pedagogical application); Peter Reason & colleagues (participatory integration)D. Jean Clandinin and F. Michael Connelly
类型Qualitative research designMethod
开创性文献van Manen, M. (1990). Researching Lived Experience: Human Science for an Action Sensitive Pedagogy. State University of New York Press. ISBN: 978-0791404645Clandinin, D. J., & Connelly, F. M. (2000). Narrative inquiry: Experience and story in qualitative research. Jossey-Bass. link ↗
别名collaborative hermeneutic phenomenology, participatory interpretive phenomenology, co-constructive hermeneutic inquiry, PHPNarrative Analysis, Narrative Research, Life Story Method
相关53
摘要Participatory Hermeneutic Phenomenology combines the interpretive, text-oriented tradition of hermeneutic phenomenology — rooted in Heidegger and developed by van Manen — with a participatory ethos in which research participants are treated as active co-inquirers rather than passive informants. The approach seeks to understand the meaning of lived experience through a collaborative hermeneutic circle where researcher and participants jointly interpret experience, text, and context across iterative cycles of dialogue.Narrative inquiry is a qualitative research methodology that treats stories and life narratives as primary data, analyzing how individuals construct meaning and identity through storytelling. Developed by D. Jean Clandinin and F. Michael Connelly (2000), narrative inquiry examines the narratives people tell about their lives, experiences, and transitions, understanding that people make sense of experience through narrative.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Participatory Hermeneutic Phenomenology · Narrative Inquiry. 于 2026-06-20 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare