ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

参与式文献分析×参与式行动研究 (PAR)×
领域质性质性
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份1940s–2000s (synthesis of participatory tradition and systematic document analysis)1940s (Lewin); PAR as distinct tradition formalised ~1970s–1980s
提出者Rooted in participatory action research (Kurt Lewin, 1940s); document analysis formalized by Glenn Bowen (2009)Kurt Lewin (action research foundations, 1940s); systematised for participatory contexts by Orlando Fals Borda, Paulo Freire, and William Foote Whyte
类型Qualitative research designQualitative research method
开创性文献Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. DOI ↗Kemmis, S., McTaggart, R., & Nixon, R. (2014). The Action Research Planner: Doing Critical Participatory Action Research. Springer. link ↗
别名PDA, collaborative document analysis, participatory archival analysis, community-based document analysisPAR, community-based participatory research, collaborative action research, participatory inquiry
相关46
摘要Participatory Document Analysis is a qualitative research approach that systematically examines existing documents — such as policy records, reports, correspondence, and community archives — while actively involving community members or stakeholders as co-researchers in the selection, interpretation, and meaning-making processes. It merges the rigor of established document analysis techniques with the democratic ethos of participatory action research, ensuring that those most affected by the documents have voice in shaping what those documents mean.Participatory Action Research (PAR) is a qualitative, community-centred methodology in which researchers and community members collaborate as co-investigators to identify a shared problem, take deliberate action, observe outcomes, and reflect critically on results — cycling iteratively until meaningful change is achieved. Unlike conventional research that studies people from the outside, PAR treats participants as active agents who co-own the research process, the knowledge produced, and the practical interventions that follow.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Participatory Document analysis · Participatory Action Research. 于 2026-06-19 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare