方法对比

	参与式文献分析	文献分析
领域	质性	质性研究
方法族	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
起源年份	1940s–2000s (synthesis of participatory tradition and systematic document analysis)	1920
提出者	Rooted in participatory action research (Kurt Lewin, 1940s); document analysis formalized by Glenn Bowen (2009)	Max Weber and Karl Mannheim
类型	Qualitative research design	Method
开创性文献	Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40.	Scott, J. (1990). A Matter of Record: Documentary Sources in Social Research. Polity Press. ISBN: 978-0745608419
别名	PDA, collaborative document analysis, participatory archival analysis, community-based document analysis	documentary analysis, textual analysis, content analysis of documents, archival research
相关	4	4
摘要	Participatory Document Analysis is a qualitative research approach that systematically examines existing documents — such as policy records, reports, correspondence, and community archives — while actively involving community members or stakeholders as co-researchers in the selection, interpretation, and meaning-making processes. It merges the rigor of established document analysis techniques with the democratic ethos of participatory action research, ensuring that those most affected by the documents have voice in shaping what those documents mean.	Document analysis is a systematic qualitative research method for examining written, visual, or audiovisual sources—such as policy documents, historical records, organizational records, media reports, emails, social media posts, photographs, or videos—to extract meaning, identify patterns, and understand social phenomena. Developed by Weber and Mannheim in early 20th-century sociology, the method bridges historical research, content analysis, and textual interpretation. Document analysis is used across disciplines to understand organizational change, policy evolution, media representation, historical events, and cultural meaning. Documents provide evidence of what organizations, institutions, or societies value, decide, and communicate, often revealing contradictions between policy and practice.