ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

面板Toda-Yamamoto因果关系检验×面板格兰杰因果检验×
领域计量经济学计量经济学
方法族Regression modelRegression model
起源年份1995 (panel extension from 2006)1988–2012
提出者Toda & Yamamoto (1995); extended to panel settings by Konya (2006) and othersHoltz-Eakin, Newey & Rosen (1988); Dumitrescu & Hurlin (2012)
类型Causality test (non-causality hypothesis)Causality test
开创性文献Toda, H. Y., & Yamamoto, T. (1995). Statistical inference in vector autoregressions with possibly integrated processes. Journal of Econometrics, 66(1-2), 225-250. DOI ↗Dumitrescu, E.-I., & Hurlin, C. (2012). Testing for Granger non-causality in heterogeneous panels. Economic Modelling, 29(4), 1450–1460. DOI ↗
别名Panel TY causality test, Toda-Yamamoto panel causality, panel modified Wald causality test, panel MWALD causalitypanel causality test, Dumitrescu-Hurlin test, heterogeneous panel causality, panel Granger test
相关55
摘要The Panel Toda-Yamamoto (PTY) causality test extends the Toda-Yamamoto modified Wald approach to panel data, allowing researchers to test Granger non-causality across multiple cross-sectional units without requiring pre-testing for cointegration or imposing a common causality direction on all units.The Panel Granger Causality test examines whether past values of one variable help predict another variable across multiple cross-sectional units observed over time. It extends the classical Granger causality framework to panel data, accounting for cross-sectional heterogeneity and enabling more powerful inference by pooling information across units.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Panel Toda-Yamamoto Causality · Panel Granger Causality. 于 2026-06-19 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare