ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

组织变革实施准备度 (ORIC)×知识转化行动框架 (KTA)×
领域实施科学实施科学
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份20142004
提出者Christopher M. Shea, PhD; Sarah R. Jacobs, PhD; Dean A. Esserman, PhD; and colleaguesIan D. Graham, PhD; Roberta L. Logan, MD, MSc; colleagues at Ottawa Hospital Research Institute
类型Self-report organizational surveyConceptual framework and process model
开创性文献Shea, C. M., Jacobs, S. R., Esserman, D. A., Wagner, S. L., & Kraemer, D. F. (2014). Organizational readiness for implementing change: A psychometric assessment of a new measure. Implementation Science, 9, 26. DOI ↗Graham, I. D., & Logan, R. L. (2004). Translating research into practice: A perspective on technology transfer. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 11(2), 141–145. link ↗
别名ORIC, Organizational Readiness for Change, ORIC-12KTA, Knowledge-to-Action, KTA Framework, Knowledge-to-Action Cycle
相关55
摘要The Organizational Readiness for Implementing Change (ORIC) is a 12-item self-report measure that assesses organizational readiness to implement evidence-based practices and innovations. Developed by Shea and colleagues in 2014, the ORIC measures two critical dimensions of organizational readiness: Change Commitment (the extent to which staff and leadership are motivated and dedicated to implementing change) and Change Efficacy (the extent to which staff believe they have the capability and resources to successfully implement the change). The ORIC is grounded in implementation science theory and has demonstrated strong psychometric properties and predictive validity for implementation success across healthcare, mental health, and organizational settings.The Knowledge-to-Action (KTA) Framework is a conceptual model and process guide for translating evidence into practice, developed by Ian Graham and colleagues at the Ottawa Hospital Research Institute (2004–2006). The KTA framework addresses a central challenge in implementation science: research evidence alone does not change practice; a deliberate, systematic process is required to adapt evidence to local contexts, identify and overcome implementation barriers, and sustain change. The KTA distinguishes between knowledge production (research, evidence synthesis) and knowledge application (implementation planning, barrier identification, strategy selection, execution, monitoring, and adaptation). The framework has become one of the most widely adopted implementation models in healthcare, particularly in Canada and internationally, and provides a structured approach to evidence-based practice implementation that is context-sensitive and iterative.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 1 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: ORIC · KTA. 于 2026-06-19 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare