ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

序数 法则 效度×nomological validity×
领域心理测量学心理测量学
方法族Latent structureLatent structure
起源年份1955 (concept); ordinal application 1990s–present1955
提出者Cronbach & Meehl (nomological network concept); ordinal extension in modern psychometricsLee J. Cronbach & Paul E. Meehl
类型Validity assessmentValidity evidence framework
开创性文献Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281–302. DOI ↗Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281–302. DOI ↗
别名nomological validity for ordinal data, ordinal nomological network, construct network validity (ordinal), ordinal criterion-related validitynomological network validity, construct network validity, nomological web validity
相关56
摘要Ordinal nomological validity examines whether a construct measured with ordinal items (e.g., Likert-type scales) behaves in theoretically predicted ways within a nomological network — a web of expected relationships with other constructs and criteria — using methods suited to ordinal data rather than assuming continuous measurement.Nomological validity evaluates whether a construct behaves as theory predicts within a broader network of related constructs. It is not a single statistical test but an accumulation of evidence that the measure fits coherently into a web of theoretically grounded relationships — demonstrating that what is measured is what the theory says it should measure.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Ordinal Nomological Validity · Nomological Validity. 于 2026-06-18 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare