方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法；存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| 序数判别效度× | 构念效度× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域 | 心理测量学 | 心理测量学 |
| 方法族 | Latent structure | Latent structure |
| 起源年份≠ | 1959 (concept); 2000s–2010s (ordinal adaptations) | 1955 |
| 提出者≠ | Campbell & Fiske (discriminant validity concept); adapted for ordinal data by subsequent psychometricians | Lee J. Cronbach & Paul E. Meehl |
| 类型≠ | Validity assessment | Validity evaluation framework |
| 开创性文献≠ | Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56(2), 81–105. DOI ↗ | Cronbach, L. J. & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281–302. DOI ↗ |
| 别名 | discriminant validity for ordinal data, polychoric discriminant validity, ordinal HTMT, ordinal AVE-based discriminant validity | construct validation, factorial validity, nomological validity evidence, validity of interpretation |
| 相关 | 6 | 6 |
| 摘要≠ | Ordinal discriminant validity assesses whether a latent construct measured by ordinal (Likert-type) items is empirically distinct from other constructs in the same instrument. It applies polychoric correlations and ordinal-appropriate factor loadings to standard discriminant validity criteria such as the Fornell-Larcker rule and the Heterotrait-Monotrait ratio (HTMT), ensuring that validity conclusions are not distorted by the non-continuous nature of ordered-response data. | Construct validity is the degree to which a test or scale actually measures the theoretical construct it is intended to measure. Introduced by Cronbach and Meehl in 1955, it is the central validity concern in psychological and educational measurement, evaluated by accumulating multiple lines of empirical and logical evidence rather than by any single statistical test. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|