方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法；存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| 序数内容效度评估× | 量表开发× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域 | 心理测量学 | 心理测量学 |
| 方法族 | Latent structure | Latent structure |
| 起源年份≠ | 2003 | 1991–1995 |
| 提出者≠ | Wynd, Schmidt & Schaefer | Multiple contributors; codified by Robert DeVellis and Lee Anna Clark & David Watson |
| 类型≠ | Scale validation / content validity | Multi-step methodological framework |
| 开创性文献≠ | Wynd, C. A., Schmidt, B., & Schaefer, M. A. (2003). Two quantitative approaches for estimating content validity. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 25(5), 508–518. DOI ↗ | DeVellis, R. F. (2016). Scale Development: Theory and Applications (4th ed.). SAGE Publications. ISBN: 978-1506341569 |
| 别名 | ordinal CVI, Likert-scale content validity, ordinal expert rating validity, graded content validity | questionnaire construction, instrument development, measurement scale construction, psychometric scale building |
| 相关≠ | 4 | 5 |
| 摘要≠ | Ordinal content validity replaces the traditional binary (yes/no) expert relevance judgment with a graded, Likert-type rating scale, allowing richer expert opinion to be captured when evaluating whether scale items adequately represent the intended construct domain. | Scale development is a structured, multi-step process for creating psychometrically sound measurement instruments that capture latent psychological constructs. It encompasses construct definition, item generation, expert review, exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis, reliability estimation, and validity evidence collection — producing a final set of items suitable for quantitative research. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|