方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法；存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| 序数内容效度评估× | 项目分析（经典测量理论）× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域 | 心理测量学 | 心理测量学 |
| 方法族 | Latent structure | Latent structure |
| 起源年份≠ | 2003 | 1979 |
| 提出者≠ | Wynd, Schmidt & Schaefer | Classical Test Theory tradition; foundational texts by Allen & Yen (1979) and Crocker & Algina (1986) |
| 类型≠ | Scale validation / content validity | Descriptive / psychometric screening |
| 开创性文献≠ | Wynd, C. A., Schmidt, B., & Schaefer, M. A. (2003). Two quantitative approaches for estimating content validity. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 25(5), 508–518. DOI ↗ | Allen, M. J. & Yen, W. M. (1979). Introduction to Measurement Theory. Brooks/Cole. ISBN: 978-0818501333 |
| 别名≠ | ordinal CVI, Likert-scale content validity, ordinal expert rating validity, graded content validity | Madde Analizi (Klasik Test Kuramı), CTT item analysis, classical item analysis |
| 相关≠ | 4 | 5 |
| 摘要≠ | Ordinal content validity replaces the traditional binary (yes/no) expert relevance judgment with a graded, Likert-type rating scale, allowing richer expert opinion to be captured when evaluating whether scale items adequately represent the intended construct domain. | Item analysis is the foundational psychometric procedure for evaluating the quality of individual test or scale items within the Classical Test Theory (CTT) framework, as systematised by Allen and Yen (1979) and Crocker and Algina (1986). It produces an item difficulty index, an item discrimination index, and a distractor analysis for each item, enabling test developers to identify items that are too easy, too hard, or failing to separate high- and low-ability respondents. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|