ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

开放编码×内容分析×
领域质性质性
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份1967 (Glaser & Strauss); refined 1990 (Strauss & Corbin)Systematised through Krippendorff's methodology work; 4th edition 2018
提出者Barney G. Glaser & Anselm L. Strauss (classic grounded theory); elaborated by Anselm Strauss & Juliet CorbinKlaus Krippendorff (systematic formulation); roots in early 20th-century communications research
类型Qualitative research methodQualitative / mixed-method research technique
开创性文献Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory (2nd ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-0803959408Krippendorff, K. (2018). Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology (4th ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1506395661
别名initial coding, open categorisation, substantive codingİçerik Analizi, systematic content coding, quantitative content analysis
相关65
摘要Open coding is the first, exploratory phase of qualitative data analysis in which raw text — interviews, field notes, or documents — is broken into discrete segments and labelled with short descriptive codes. Developed within grounded theory by Glaser and Strauss and later elaborated by Strauss and Corbin, the procedure is deliberately open and inductive: the analyst reads line-by-line without imposing a predetermined framework, allowing concepts to emerge directly from the data. The resulting codes are then compared and grouped into provisional categories that become the building blocks for subsequent, more selective analysis.Content analysis is a systematic research technique for reducing text, visual, or media material into coded categories so that patterns can be counted, compared, and interpreted. Formalised by Klaus Krippendorff in his widely cited methodology textbook (latest edition 2018), the method sits at the boundary of qualitative and quantitative inquiry: it imposes structured, replicable coding on inherently meaning-laden material.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Open Coding · Content Analysis. 于 2026-06-15 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare