方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| 在线文档收集× | 文献收集× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域 | 调查方法论 | 调查方法论 |
| 方法族 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 起源年份≠ | 1990s–2000s (digital / web era) | 19th–20th century historical methods; contemporary social-science codification c. 2000s |
| 提出者≠ | Adapted from traditional document analysis; digital form emerged with widespread internet adoption | Rooted in historical and social science traditions; systematized by Lindsay Prior and Glenn Bowen |
| 类型≠ | Qualitative / mixed-methods data collection technique | Qualitative / mixed data-collection technique |
| 开创性文献 | Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. DOI ↗ | Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. DOI ↗ |
| 别名 | digital document collection, web document gathering, online archival data collection, digital records collection | document analysis, documentary method, document review, secondary document analysis |
| 相关≠ | 5 | 3 |
| 摘要≠ | Online document collection is the systematic process of identifying, retrieving, and compiling digital documents — including web pages, institutional publications, social media posts, policy documents, and digital archives — as primary or supplementary research data. It extends classical document analysis into internet-mediated environments, enabling researchers to access large, geographically dispersed corpora without fieldwork travel or physical archive access. | Document collection is a systematic data-collection technique in which the researcher gathers and reviews existing written, visual, or digital records — such as reports, meeting minutes, policies, letters, photographs, or institutional records — as primary or supplementary evidence. It is widely used in qualitative, historical, and mixed-methods research and can stand alone or complement interviews and observation. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|