ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

名义小组技术×焦点小组研究×
领域质性质性
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份19711940s (sociological origin); modern applied form from the 1980s–1990s
提出者André L. Delbecq and Andrew H. Van de VenRobert K. Merton (sociological precursor, 1940s); popularised in applied research by Richard A. Krueger
类型Qualitative research methodQualitative data collection method
开创性文献Delbecq, A. L., & Van de Ven, A. H. (1971). A group process model for problem identification and program planning. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 7(4), 466–492. link ↗Krueger, R.A. & Casey, M.A. (2014). Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research (5th ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1483365244
别名NGT, structured group process, nominal group process, priority-setting group methodfocus group discussion, FGD, group interview, Odak Grup Araştırması
相关66
摘要The Nominal Group Technique (NGT) is a structured group facilitation method designed to generate and prioritise ideas, problems, or solutions while ensuring equal participation from all members. Developed by Delbecq and Van de Ven in 1971, it combines silent individual idea generation with structured group discussion and systematic voting to produce a ranked list of priorities. Unlike unstructured focus groups, NGT prevents dominant voices from suppressing quieter participants, making it especially valuable for needs assessment, program planning, and stakeholder priority-setting in applied research and policy contexts.Focus group research is a qualitative data-collection method in which a trained moderator guides structured discussions with homogeneous groups of six to ten participants to explore ideas, attitudes, and perceptions on a defined topic. Developed from sociological roots in the 1940s and systematised for applied research by Krueger and Casey, the method leverages group interaction as a data source — revealing not just what people think, but how they negotiate and articulate views in a social setting.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Nominal Group Technique · Focus Group. 于 2026-06-18 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare