方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法；存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| 确定客观标准权重的НМД方法× | 加法比率评估× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域 | 决策 | 决策 |
| 方法族 | MCDM | MCDM |
| 起源年份≠ | 2017 | 2010 |
| 提出者≠ | Bulut, E. | Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. |
| 类型≠ | Weight_Objective (normalised matrix column-mean based) | Additive utility ratio (optimal reference row) |
| 开创性文献≠ | Bulut, E. (2017). A comparative analysis of the criteria weights determination methods for selection of ship propulsion system. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part M: Journal of Engineering for the Maritime Environment link ↗ | Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. (2010). A new additive ratio assessment (ARAS) method in multicriteria decision-making. Technological and Economic Development of Economy link ↗ |
| 别名 | — | — |
| 相关 | 8 | 8 |
| 摘要≠ | NMD (New Method of Determining objective criterion weights) is a weight objective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Bulut, E. in 2017. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. | ARAS (Additive Ratio Assessment) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. in 2010. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|