ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

基于网络的变异检测×全基因组关联研究 (GWAS)×
领域生物信息学生物信息学
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份2017–20182005–2007
提出者Erik Garrison, Paten lab (UCSC); Hannes Eggertsson, deCODE GeneticsKlein et al. (age-related macular degeneration GWAS, 2005); landmark scale: Wellcome Trust Case Control Consortium (2007)
类型Computational genomics pipelineObservational genomic association study
开创性文献Garrison, E., Sirén, J., Novak, A. M., Hickey, G., Eizenga, J. M., Dawson, E. T., Jones, W., Garg, S., Markello, C., Lin, M. F., Paten, B., & Durbin, R. (2018). Variation graph toolkit improves read mapping by representing genetic variation in the reference. Nature Biotechnology, 36(9), 875–879. DOI ↗Wellcome Trust Case Control Consortium. (2007). Genome-wide association study of 14,000 cases of seven common diseases and 3,000 shared controls. Nature, 447(7145), 661–678. link ↗
别名graph-genome variant calling, variation graph genotyping, vg-based variant calling, pangenome variant callingGWAS, genome-wide association analysis, whole-genome association study, WGAS
相关66
摘要Network-based (graph-genome) variant calling replaces the conventional single linear reference genome with a variation graph — a network in which nodes represent sequence segments and edges represent known alternative paths through the genome. Reads are mapped onto this graph, enabling detection of SNPs, indels, and structural variants with substantially lower reference bias than linear-reference pipelines. Key tools include the Variation Graph Toolkit (vg) and Graphtyper.A genome-wide association study (GWAS) systematically tests hundreds of thousands to millions of single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) across the human genome for statistical association with a trait or disease. By comparing allele frequencies between cases and controls — or by regressing SNP genotypes on a quantitative phenotype — GWAS identifies genomic loci that harbor common genetic variants contributing to complex traits. Since its large-scale debut in 2007, GWAS has catalogued thousands of robust disease–variant associations across virtually every common human condition.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Network-based variant calling · Genome-wide association study. 于 2026-06-18 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare