方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法；存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| 多案例设计研究× | 比较案例研究× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域≠ | 田野方法 | 质性 |
| 方法族 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 起源年份≠ | 1992 (DBR); multiple-case variant codified through 2000s–2010s | 1984 (Yin); 1995 (Stake) |
| 提出者≠ | Ann Brown and Allan Collins (DBR origins); multiple-case extension developed by the DBR Collective and scholars such as Jan Herrington and Thomas Reeves | Robert K. Yin; Robert E. Stake |
| 类型≠ | Interventionist qualitative/mixed-methods design | Qualitative / mixed research design |
| 开创性文献≠ | Brown, A. L. (1992). Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in classroom settings. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2(2), 141–178. DOI ↗ | Yin, R. K. (2018). Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods (6th ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1506336169 |
| 别名 | multi-site DBR, multi-case design experiment, multiple-site design research, MCDBR | cross-case study, multi-site case study, multiple case study design, comparative case analysis |
| 相关≠ | 5 | 4 |
| 摘要≠ | Multiple-case design-based research (MCDBR) is an interventionist methodology drawn from the learning sciences and education research. It extends single-site design-based research by implementing and iteratively refining an educational intervention across two or more distinct sites, contexts, or participant groups simultaneously or sequentially. The cross-case structure strengthens theoretical transferability and exposes context-dependent variations that a single site could never reveal. | Comparative case study is a qualitative research design in which two or more bounded cases are studied in depth and then systematically compared to identify similarities, differences, and patterns across contexts. Rooted in Yin's replication logic and Stake's multiple case framework, it is particularly suited to questions that ask how or why a phenomenon unfolds differently — or similarly — across distinct settings, populations, or time periods. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|