ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

多案例扎根理论×案例研究×
领域质性质性
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份1980s–1990s (integrative development)1984 (seminal codification)
提出者Synthesised from Kathleen Eisenhardt (multiple-case logic) and Barney Glaser & Anselm Strauss (grounded theory)Robert K. Yin (systematised in Case Study Research, 1984)
类型Qualitative research design combining case study and grounded theoryQualitative research design
开创性文献Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550. DOI ↗Yin, R.K. (2018). Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods (6th ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1506336169
别名multi-case grounded theory, MCGT, comparative case grounded theory, cross-case grounded theoryVaka Çalışması (Case Study), case study design, case study methodology
相关65
摘要Multiple case-based grounded theory is a qualitative research design that embeds grounded theory's inductive coding logic inside a structured multiple-case framework. Rather than generating theory from a single site or interview pool, researchers iteratively collect and analyze data across two or more purposefully selected cases, using constant comparison both within and across cases until theoretical saturation is reached. The result is a substantive theory grounded in rich, cross-site empirical evidence.Case study research is a qualitative research design that investigates a specific phenomenon, individual, group, organisation, or event in depth within its real-world context. Systematised by Robert K. Yin in 1984, it supports single-case and multiple-case designs and draws on multiple data sources — interviews, observation, documents, and artefacts — to build a rich, contextualised account of a bounded unit.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Multiple Case-Based Grounded Theory · Case Study. 于 2026-06-15 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare