ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

多层判别效度×判别效度×
领域心理测量学心理测量学
方法族Latent structureLatent structure
起源年份20051959
提出者Dyer, Hanges, & Hall; Chen, Sousa, & WestDonald T. Campbell and Donald W. Fiske
类型Validity evaluation within multilevel CFAValidity evidence / psychometric evaluation
开创性文献Dyer, N. G., Hanges, P. J., & Hall, R. J. (2005). Applying multilevel confirmatory factor analysis techniques to the study of leadership. Leadership Quarterly, 16(1), 149–167. DOI ↗Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56(2), 81–105. DOI ↗
别名multilevel DV, cross-level discriminant validity, hierarchical discriminant validity, ML-DVdiscriminant validity evidence, divergent validity, DV, AVE-based discriminant validity
相关55
摘要Multilevel discriminant validity evaluates whether theoretically distinct constructs are empirically separable when data are nested within higher-level units such as teams, schools, or organizations. It extends single-level discriminant validity checks into a multilevel confirmatory factor analysis framework, verifying that constructs are distinguishable both within and between levels simultaneously.Discriminant validity is evidence that a latent construct is empirically distinct from other constructs it should differ from. Originating in Campbell and Fiske's multitrait-multimethod framework (1959), it is a core component of construct validity and a mandatory check in scale development and structural equation modeling.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Multilevel Discriminant Validity · Discriminant Validity. 于 2026-06-17 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare