ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

多中心筛查试验评估×多中心队列研究×
领域流行病学流行病学
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份1976–2003 (core diagnostic accuracy framework; multicenter STARD standards formalized 2003)Mid-to-late 20th century (widespread adoption 1970s–1990s)
提出者Methodological consensus (STARD group, Bossuyt et al.); broader diagnostic accuracy tradition rooted in Hanley & McNeil (1982) and Sackett & Haynes (1976)Developed incrementally through large collaborative epidemiological projects (e.g., Framingham Heart Study consortium expansions, 1948 onward; EPIC study, 1992)
类型Observational diagnostic accuracy studyObservational longitudinal study
开创性文献Bossuyt, P. M., Reitsma, J. B., Bruns, D. E., Gatsonis, C. A., Glasziou, P. P., Irwig, L. M., Lijmer, J. G., Moher, D., Rennie, D., & de Vet, H. C. W. (2003). Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: The STARD Initiative. Annals of Internal Medicine, 138(1), 40-44. DOI ↗Rothman, K. J., Greenland, S., & Lash, T. L. (2008). Modern Epidemiology (3rd ed.). Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. ISBN: 978-0781755641
别名multicenter diagnostic accuracy study, multisite screening evaluation, multicenter test performance study, multicenter DTA studymultisite cohort study, multi-centre cohort, collaborative cohort study, pooled cohort study
相关66
摘要A multicenter screening test evaluation measures the diagnostic accuracy of a screening test — its sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, and ROC-curve area — by enrolling participants across two or more independent clinical sites. Conducting the study at multiple centers broadens the patient spectrum, tests generalizability across different laboratory conditions and patient populations, and produces more externally valid accuracy estimates than a single-center study.A multicenter cohort study follows defined groups of participants at two or more geographically or institutionally distinct sites over time to estimate incidence, identify risk factors, and quantify associations between exposures and outcomes. By pooling data from multiple centers, it achieves statistical power and population diversity that single-site designs cannot match, making it the workhorse of large-scale epidemiological and clinical research.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Multicenter Screening Test Evaluation · Multicenter cohort study. 于 2026-06-17 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare