方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| 多中心II期临床试验× | 多中心随机临床试验× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域 | 流行病学 | 流行病学 |
| 方法族 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 起源年份≠ | 1970s–1980s (formalized in regulatory guidance; Simon two-stage design 1989) | 1970s–1980s (widespread adoption for large-scale efficacy trials) |
| 提出者≠ | Established through ICH and FDA regulatory frameworks; Simon two-stage design formalized by Richard Simon (1989) | Evolved from single-center RCT methodology; consolidated through landmark trials such as the MRC streptomycin trial (1948) and large cardiovascular mega-trials of the 1970s–1980s |
| 类型≠ | Interventional clinical trial design | Interventional experimental design |
| 开创性文献≠ | International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use (ICH). (2009). ICH Harmonised Tripartite Guideline: General Considerations for Clinical Studies E8(R1). ICH. link ↗ | Friedman, L. M., Furberg, C. D., DeMets, D. L., Reboussin, D. M., & Granger, C. B. (2015). Fundamentals of Clinical Trials (5th ed.). Springer. ISBN: 978-3319185385 |
| 别名 | multi-site phase II trial, phase 2 multicenter study, multicenter Phase IIA/IIB trial, multisite efficacy trial | multi-site RCT, multicenter RCT, multinational randomized trial, multicenter controlled trial |
| 相关 | 6 | 6 |
| 摘要≠ | A multicenter phase II clinical trial is an interventional study conducted at two or more independent clinical sites to evaluate the preliminary efficacy and safety of a new treatment in a defined patient population, following demonstrated tolerability in phase I. By pooling patients across sites, the design achieves the sample sizes needed to estimate response rates and identify promising signals before committing to the larger investment of a phase III confirmatory trial. | A multicenter randomized clinical trial (RCT) is an experimental study in which eligible participants are randomly assigned to intervention or control arms simultaneously across two or more clinical sites. By combining the rigor of randomization with enrollment from geographically or institutionally diverse centers, this design produces large samples and externally valid effect estimates that single-center trials rarely achieve. It is the regulatory gold standard for confirmatory efficacy and safety evaluation of new treatments. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|