ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

多期事件研究设计×动态双重差分×
领域因果推断因果推断
方法族Regression modelRegression model
起源年份19932021
提出者Jacobson, LaLonde & Sullivan (1993); seminal methodological treatment by Sun & Abraham (2021)Callaway & Sant'Anna; Sun & Abraham
类型Quasi-experimental causal inferenceCausal inference / quasi-experimental
开创性文献Jacobson, L. S., LaLonde, R. J., & Sullivan, D. G. (1993). Earnings losses of displaced workers. American Economic Review, 83(4), 888-909. link ↗Callaway, B., & Sant'Anna, P. H. C. (2021). Difference-in-differences with multiple time periods. Journal of Econometrics, 225(2), 200-230. DOI ↗
别名multi-period event study, dynamic event study, relative-time event study, leads-and-lags designDynamic DiD, Staggered DiD, Event-time DiD, Heterogeneous-timing DiD
相关34
摘要The multi-period event study design estimates causal treatment effects at each point in time relative to the treatment onset, using panel data with multiple pre- and post-treatment periods. By plotting the full path of treatment coefficients rather than a single average, it reveals how effects build up, fade, or remain stable over time — and allows formal tests of pre-treatment parallel trends across many periods simultaneously.Dynamic Difference-in-Differences extends the classic DiD framework to settings where units adopt treatment at different times. Rather than collapsing all variation into a single 2x2 comparison, it estimates group-time average treatment effects for each adoption cohort at each calendar period, then aggregates them into interpretable summaries of the causal effect over event time.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Multi-period Event Study Design · Dynamic Difference-in-Differences. 于 2026-06-17 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare