ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

多期反事实影响评估×反事实影响评估 (CIE)×
领域因果推断因果推断
方法族Regression modelRegression model
起源年份2000s–2010s1970s–2000s
提出者Developed through EU policy evaluation practice (European Commission); formalized by Lechner, Caliendo, and related econometriciansHeckman, Imbens, Rubin, and the program evaluation literature
类型Causal inference / quasi-experimental evaluationCausal inference / program evaluation
开创性文献Caliendo, M., & Kopeinig, S. (2008). Some Practical Guidance for the Implementation of Propensity Score Matching. Journal of Economic Surveys, 22(1), 31-72. DOI ↗Heckman, J. J., & Vytlacil, E. J. (2007). Econometric evaluation of social programs, Part I: Causal models, structural models and econometric policy evaluation. Handbook of Econometrics, 6B, 4779-4874. DOI ↗
别名multi-period CIE, longitudinal counterfactual evaluation, dynamic counterfactual impact evaluation, multi-wave CIECIE, counterfactual evaluation, counterfactual policy evaluation, impact evaluation
相关45
摘要Multi-period Counterfactual Impact Evaluation (CIE) estimates the causal effect of a policy or program by constructing what would have happened to treated units across multiple time periods had they not been treated. Unlike single-period evaluations, it tracks treatment effects as they evolve over time, capturing dynamic, delayed, or fading impacts that a two-period comparison would miss.Counterfactual Impact Evaluation is a family of causal methods that estimates the effect of an intervention by comparing what actually happened to participants with what would have happened had the intervention not taken place. Formalised in the Rubin Causal Model and extended by Heckman, Imbens and others, CIE underlies most modern program and policy evaluation practice.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Multi-period Counterfactual Impact Evaluation · Counterfactual Impact Evaluation. 于 2026-06-20 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare