ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

多群体量表开发×多组验证性因子分析 (MG-CFA)×
领域心理测量学心理测量学
方法族Latent structureLatent structure
起源年份1971 (multi-group CFA); 2000 (applied synthesis for scale development)1971
提出者Jöreskog, K. G. (multi-group SEM framework); systematised for scale development by Vandenberg & Lance (2000)Karl Jöreskog
类型Scale development / measurement model testingMeasurement model / invariance test
开创性文献Vandenberg, R. J., & Lance, C. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3(1), 4–70. DOI ↗Vandenberg, R. J. & Lance, C. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3(1), 4–70. DOI ↗
别名MGSD, cross-group scale development, multi-sample scale development, comparative scale constructionMG-CFA, multi-group CFA, measurement invariance testing, multi-sample CFA
相关66
摘要Multi-group scale development constructs and validates a measurement scale simultaneously across two or more distinct populations or groups. The approach integrates standard item generation and factor-analytic procedures with a systematic hierarchy of measurement invariance tests to ensure that the resulting scale measures the same construct in the same way in every target group.Multi-group confirmatory factor analysis tests whether a measurement model holds equivalently across two or more groups — such as cultures, genders, or time points. By imposing increasingly stringent equality constraints and comparing model fit, it determines whether comparisons of latent mean scores are justified.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Multi-group scale development · Multi-group confirmatory factor analysis. 于 2026-06-17 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare