ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

多群体项目反应理论 (MG-IRT)×多组验证性因子分析 (MG-CFA)×
领域心理测量学心理测量学
方法族Latent structureLatent structure
起源年份1990s1971
提出者Multiple contributors; formalized by Birnbaum (1968) for IRT; multi-group extensions developed through 1980s–1990sKarl Jöreskog
类型Latent trait / measurement invarianceMeasurement model / invariance test
开创性文献Embretson, S. E. & Reise, S. P. (2000). Item Response Theory for Psychologists. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. ISBN: 978-0805828191Vandenberg, R. J. & Lance, C. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3(1), 4–70. DOI ↗
别名MG-IRT, multiple-group IRT, multi-group latent trait model, IRT across groupsMG-CFA, multi-group CFA, measurement invariance testing, multi-sample CFA
相关66
摘要Multi-group item response theory fits IRT models simultaneously across two or more defined groups — such as males and females, or different cultural samples — to determine whether item parameters are invariant across those groups. It is the primary IRT-based framework for testing measurement equivalence and detecting differential item functioning (DIF) at the model level.Multi-group confirmatory factor analysis tests whether a measurement model holds equivalently across two or more groups — such as cultures, genders, or time points. By imposing increasingly stringent equality constraints and comparing model fit, it determines whether comparisons of latent mean scores are justified.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Multi-group item response theory · Multi-group confirmatory factor analysis. 于 2026-06-19 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare